Two companies have been fined £46,000 in total after a labourer fractured his skull.
The man had been working on a new build house when he fell through a stairwell on 3 March 2021.
He was working at a construction site four new semi-detached and five terraced houses at the site.
The worker was on the first floor in one of the new terraced properties after being instructed by the director of the company to clear up debris and mortar that had been left behind by bricklayers.
He had climbed up the first floor using a ladder at the stairwell opening, which had been covered with temporary boards. The boards were slid apart to allow access to the first floor.
Intending to sweep the debris down the stairwell opening, the man lifted up one of the temporary boards and stepped forward as he was going to lean it against a wall.
However, he fell through the stairwell opening onto the ground floor below as there were no floorboards underneath the temporary boards.
He fractured his skull, sustained multiple broken ribs and needed a plate to be inserted into his collarbone.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the principal contractor Challenger Building Services Limited and Total Brickwork (UK) Ltd, the contractor in control of the work activity, had failed to plan, manage and monitor work at the site to ensure it could be carried out safely. Any worker accessing the first floor was at risk of injury due to a lack of appropriate measures for preventing falls from height.
The company was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay £1,991.32 in costs.
The company was fined £16,000 and ordered to pay £1,991.32 in costs at Warrington Magistrates’ Court on 23 October 2023.
The HSE inspector said: “This incident could so easily have been avoided had the risks associated with working on the upper floors been adequately assessed and measures been taken to protect the stairwell openings.
“Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards.”
This HSE prosecution was supported by a HSE enforcement lawyer.
Source: HSE